Cases 71 - 80 of 517
Samayoa v. iMobile USA LLC
as 1:2022cv03389
Plaintiff:
Andrea Samayoa
Defendant:
iMobile USA LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Samayoa v. iMobile, LLC et al
as 2:2022cv03389
Plaintiff:
Andrea Samayoa
Defendant:
iMobile, LLC and iMobile USA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Nolau v. WSP USA Inc.
as 1:2022cv04276
Plaintiff:
Michael Nolau, Michael Rojas and David Jeannotte
Defendant:
WSP USA Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Zhang v. Zhang
as 22-1012
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Meide Zhang, individually and Zhongliang Qiu, individually
Defendant / Appellee:
Liang Zhang, As shareholder, Ru Qiu Li, As shareholder and Sunshine USA Inc., DBA Wu Liang Ye
Picchi v. Tartuflanghe USA Corp et al
as 1:2022cv03558
Plaintiff:
Giovanni-Francesco Picchi
Defendant:
Tartuflanghe USA Corp, Paolo Montanaro and Stefania Montanaro
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Cashabamba v. USA Interiors LLC et al
as 1:2022cv03337
Plaintiff:
Oscar P. Cashabamba
Defendant:
USA Interiors LLC and Oscar A. Ruiz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 fl Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Pucilowski v. Spotify USA, Inc.
as 22-869
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Valerie Pucilowski
Defendant / Appellee:
Spotify USA, Inc.
Rossete et al v. Hong Kong Kitchen (USA) Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv03049
Plaintiff:
Arturo Velazquez Rossete and Cresencio Calva Cruz
Defendant:
Hong Kong Kitchen (USA) Inc. d/b/a Hong Kong Sushi, Feng Chen and Li Yong
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 fl Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Espinal v. Sephora USA, Inc.
as 1:2022cv03034
Plaintiff:
Rosalba Espinal
Defendant:
Sephora USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 lr Diversity - Labor
Akhter v. Compass Group USA, Inc.
as 1:2022cv02194
Plaintiff:
Ruma Akhter
Defendant:
Compass Group USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 020
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
