Cases 101 - 110 of 261
Schwartz et al v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
as 1:2018cv11251
Plaintiff:
Andrea Siragusa, Antonio Tammaro, Brendan Sheehan and others
Defendant:
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A
Annis v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2018cv01276
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Catherine Marie Annis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv07139
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e-2sx Job Discrimination (Sex)
Brown v. Dalton et al
as 1:2018cv00799
Defendant:
Mark Glazman, Anthony, Annie Dalton and others
Plaintiff:
Jerome Julius Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Chen v. Keilly Chinese Restaurant Corp. et al
as 1:2018cv03729
Defendant:
Keilly Chinese Restaurant Corp., Bao Xian Chen, Eugene Chen and others
Plaintiff:
Yi Xin Chen
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Chen v. Sessions
as 18-1205
Petitioner:
Cui Ping Chen, AKA Annie Duong
Respondent:
Jefferson B. Sessions III, United States Attorney General
Santos et al v. Logon Computer & Mailing Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv02347
Plaintiff:
Anny Santos
Defendant:
Logon Computer & Mailing Services, Inc., Daniel Arnowitz and Dan Cantelmo
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Miah v. The Bureaus, Inc.
as 1:2018cv01595
Defendant:
The Bureaus, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Anny Miah
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Fereira v. Allstate Processing Corp. et al
as 1:2018cv00389
Defendant:
Allstate Processing Corp. and Jim Shrayef
Plaintiff:
Annie Fereira
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Kuphal et al v. Spring Lake Ranch, Inc. et al
as 5:2018cv00002
Plaintiff:
Paula W. Kuphal , Annie Kuphal , Will Kuphal and others
Defendant:
Spring Lake Ranch, Inc. , Lynn J. Pilcher , Vanessa Lane and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
