Cases 111 - 120 of 574
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv03355
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv02805
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01706
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01599
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Naranjo et al v. The Classic of NY Nails & Spa Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv01731
Defendant:
Ying Shun Li, Mei Lan Cui, Una and others
Plaintiff:
Dolores Naranjo and Lupe
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00885
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Lin v. Garland
as 21-6082
Petitioner:
YING LIN
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Fong et. al. v. Kotobuki Restaurant, Inc. et. al.
as 2:2021cv00747
Plaintiff:
Mary Y. Yueh, Sheng Lin, Angela Fong and others
Defendant:
Kotobuki Manhattan, Inc. doing business as Kotobuki doing business as Kotobuki-Manhattan, Kotobuki Management, Inc. doing business as Kotobuki, Kotobuki Restaurant, Inc. doing business as Kotobuki doing business as Kotobuki-Hauppauge and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
FONG et al v. Kotobuki Restaurant, Inc. et al
as 0:2021cv00747
Defendant:
Kotobuki Manhattan, Inc. doing business as Kotobuki doing business as Kotobuki-Manhattan, Kotobuki Management, Inc. doing business as Kotobuki, Kotobuki Restaurant, Inc. doing business as Kotobuki doing business as Kotobuki-Hauppauge and others
Plaintiff:
Sheng Lin, ANGELA FONG, Mary Y Yueh and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
