Cases 11 - 20 of 51
Constitution Pipeline Company, LLC v. A Permanent Easement for 0.67 Acres and Temporary Easement for 0.68 Acres in Summit, Schoharie County, New York, Tax Parcel Number 133.-5-14 et al
as 1:2014cv02023
Plaintiff:
Constitution Pipeline Company, LLC
Defendant:
A Permanent Easement for 0.67 Acres and Temporary Easement for 0.68 Acres in Summit, Schoharie County, New York, Tax Parcel Number 133.-5-14, Michael Aronson, Chevron U.S.A., Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Constitution Pipeline Company, LLC v. A Permanent Easement for 0.08 Acres And Temporary Easements for 0.24 Acres, In Davenport, Delaware County, New York, Tax Parcel Number 33.-1-33 et al
as 3:2014cv02022
Plaintiff:
Constitution Pipeline Company, LLC
Defendant:
A Permanent Easement for 0.08 Acres And Temporary Easements for 0.24 Acres, In Davenport, Delaware County, New York, Tax Parcel Number 33.-1-33, Charles A. Whitmore, Penny K. Whitmore and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Constitution Pipeline Company, LLC v. A Permanent Easement for 1.01 Acres and Temporary Easements for 0.76 Acres, in Masonville, Delaware County, New York, Tax Parcel Number 160.-2-9 et al
as 3:2014cv02017
Plaintiff:
Constitution Pipeline Company, LLC
Defendant:
A Permanent Easement for 1.01 Acres and Temporary Easements for 0.76 Acres, in Masonville, Delaware County, New York, Tax Parcel Number 160.-2-9, Frederick Rice, Marilyn Isaacs and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Constitution Pipeline Company, LLC v. A Permanent Easement for 0.34 Acres And Temporary Easements for 0.41 Acres in Davenport, Delaware County, New York, Tax Parcel Number 33.-1-31 et al
as 3:2014cv02021
Plaintiff:
Constitution Pipeline Company, LLC
Defendant:
A Permanent Easement for 0.34 Acres And Temporary Easements for 0.41 Acres in Davenport, Delaware County, New York, Tax Parcel Number 33.-1-31, Dustin Sperry, Kimberly Sperry and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Constitution Pipeline Company, LLC v. A Permanent Easement for 0.38 Acres and a Temporary Easement for 0.38 Acres, in Sidney, Delaware County, New York, Tax Parcel Number 75.-2-5 et al
as 3:2014cv02018
Plaintiff:
Constitution Pipeline Company, LLC
Defendant:
A Permanent Easement for 0.38 Acres and a Temporary Easement for 0.38 Acres, in Sidney, Delaware County, New York, Tax Parcel Number 75.-2-5, Geoffrey J. Schaffner, Janie A. Schaffner and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
City of New York v. Amerada Hess Corp.
as 14-3224
Defendant:
Marathon Ashland Petroleum LLC, Leemilt's Petroleum Inc., Motiva Enterprises, LLC and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Mobile Corporation, ExxonMobil Oil Corporation and Exxon Mobil Corporation
Plaintiff / Appellee:
City of New York, New York City Water Board and New York City Municipal Water Finance Authority
City of New York v. Amerada Hess Corp.
as 14-3224
Plaintiff - Appellee:
City of New York, New York City Water Board and New York City Municipal Water Finance Authority
Defendant:
Amerada Hess Corp., Atlantic Richfield Company, BP America, Inc. and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Exxon Mobil Corporation, Exxon Mobil Oil Corporation and Mobile Corporation
The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania V. Exxon Mobil Corporation, ET AL.
as 1:2014cv06228
Plaintiff:
The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
Defendant:
Exxon Mobile Corporation , ExxonMobile Oil Corporation , American Refining group Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 7413
Commonwealth of Puerto Rico et al v. Shell Oil Company et al
as 1:2014cv01014
Plaintiff:
Commonwealth of Puerto Rico and Environmental Quality Board
Defendant:
Shell Oil Company, Sol Puerto Rico Ltd., Shell Chemical Yabucoa, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 6901
City of Portageville v. Ashland, Inc.
as 1:2013cv07299
Plaintiff:
City of Portageville, Missouri
Defendant:
Ashland Inc. , BP Products North America Inc., Chevron U.S.A. inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
