Cases 11 - 20 of 2,785
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv05816
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv05828
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv05845
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv05851
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Xu et al v. Jaddou et al
as 2:2024cv05804
Defendant:
U.S Citizenship and Immigration Services, U.S. Department of Homeland Security and Ur Mendoza Jaddou
Plaintiff:
Shenning Xu and Andrew Liu
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00919
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00764
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv05695
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Quezada Palacios v. Garland
as 24-2140
Defendant:
NANCY J. ALBY, as Field Office Director of the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, MERRICK B. GARLAND, as Attorney General of the United States, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, as Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security and others
Plaintiff:
KEVIN DONELY QUEZADA PALACIOS
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv05648
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
