Cases 11 - 20 of 22
Murray v. 820 Flatbush Avenue Realty Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv01605
Defendant:
820 Flatbush Avenue Realty Inc., National Vision Care Center Inc. and National Vision, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Udean Murray
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1201 Civil Rights (Disability)
Arthur Williams Industries, LLC v. Mega Vision, Inc.
as 1:2013cv01160
Plaintiff:
Arthur Williams Industries, LLC
Defendant:
Mega Vision, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Marketvision Research, Inc. v. 360 Market Vision Inc.
as 2:2011cv00872
Defendant:
360 Market Vision Inc.
Plaintiff:
Marketvision Research, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
Feliciano v. Concepts In Vision Inc.
as 1:2011cv00063
Defendant:
Concepts In Vision Inc.
Plaintiff:
Carl Feliciano
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Fromm v. Dolgoff et al
as 1:2010cv04998
Plaintiff:
Gary Fromm
Defendant:
Gene Dolgoff, 3D Mention Media, LLC, 3-D Vision Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Viko v. World Vision, Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv10489
Plaintiff:
Paul Viko and Paul Viko
Defendant:
World Vision, Inc., World Vision, Inc., World Vision, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Emerging Vision, Inc. v. Galle
as 2:2008cv04957
Plaintiff:
Emerging Vision, Inc., Emerging Vision, Inc. and Emerging Vision, Inc.
Defendant:
Don Galle
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Viko v. World Vision, Inc.
as 2:2008cv00221
Plaintiff:
Paul Viko
Defendant:
World Vision, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Fedoriw v. New York Convention Center Operating Corporation et al
as 1:2007cv07446
Plaintiff:
Martha Fedoriw
Defendant:
New York Convention Center Operating Corporation and Carl Zeiss Vision, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv02234
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
