Cases 11 - 20 of 527
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv06782
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv06740
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Liu v. Garland
as 23-7054
Petitioner:
YI MEI LIU
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Loh Xiao Han et al v. Interexchange, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv07786
Plaintiff:
Celine Loh Xiao Han, Vannessa Chao Wan Yi, Supphattra Sonbankoh and others
Defendant:
Interexchange, Inc., Eiffel Reddings, LLC d/b/a Marie Eiffel Market, Marie Eiffel, LLC d/b/a Marie Eiffel Market and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv06511
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
US Rubber Corporation v. Mt. Hawley Insurance Company
as 1:2023cv07618
Plaintiff:
US Rubber Corporation
Defendant:
MT Hawley Insurance Company
Not Classified By Court:
Daly & Black, PC, Shu Ling Chen, Chi Yi Chen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 bc Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv05637
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv04240
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv04070
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03434
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
