Cases 21 - 27 of 27
Girau et al v. The SPX Corporation et al
as 7:2010cv04320
Plaintiff:
Louis Girau and Rosemary Girau
Defendant:
The Eaton Corporation , The CT Corporation and The Baldwin Supply Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Murtha et al v. Toyota Motor North America, Inc. et al
as 7:2010cv02419
Plaintiff:
Daniel Murtha and Nancy Murtha
Defendant:
Toyota Motor North America, Inc., Toyota Motor Engineering & Manufacturing North America Inc., Toyota Motor Manufacturing, California, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Fox v. Toyota Motor North America, Inc. et al
as 7:2010cv02166
Plaintiff:
Lucille Fox
Defendant:
Toyota Motor North America, Inc., Toyota Motor Engineering & Manufacturing North America, Inc., Toyota Motor Manufacturing, California, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Motor Vehicle Product Liability
Iglesias et al v. Toyota Motor Corporation et al
as 1:2010cv01014
Plaintiff:
Barbara Iglesias
Defendant:
Toyota Motor Corporation, Toyota Motor Sales, USA., Inc. , Toyota Motor North America, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301
Ernst & Young Inc. v. Corporation Service Company et al
as 1:2009cv00149
Plaintiff:
Ernst & Young Inc.
Defendant:
Corporation Service Company, Diversified Collection Services, Inc., CT Corporation System and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335 Interpleader Action
Vivar v. 90 Church Street Limited Partnership C/O CT Corporation System et al
as 1:2007cv04523
Plaintiff:
Luis Vivar
Defendant:
90 Church Street Limited Partnership C/O CT Corporation System, AJ Goldstein & Co. , Alan L. Merril and others
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 40101
Lee et al v. Terranova et al
as 1:2007cv00331
Plaintiff:
Bipple Lee and Amy Wai Sai Choi Lee
Defendant:
Arthur N. Terranova, Cameron E. Williams, Equity One, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
