Cases 21 - 30 of 13,772
Jones v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv04559
Plaintiff:
Theryn Jones
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Harchuck v. United States of America et al
as 7:2024cv04373
Plaintiff:
George F. Harchuck
Defendant:
United States of America, Brian R. Dragoni and Yeratma Ivelisse Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Morris v. DeLuca et al
as 1:2024cv04426
Plaintiff:
Betty Morris
Defendant:
Joseph DeLuca, M.D., Ronald Dudek, M.D., Nicola Robinson, N.P. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Singh v. United States of America et al
as 1:2024cv04122
Plaintiff:
GURPREET SINGH
Defendant:
United States of America, Uber Technologies, Inc., Uber USA, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2271 Federal Tort Claims Act
United States of America v. Floy (Edwards)
as 24-1547
Defendant:
JAUWAN EDWARDS, LUIS GARCIA, HENRY FLOY and others
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Ventura v. United States of America
as 24-1548
Petitioner:
JOSE ISMAEL VENTURA
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
United States of America v. Arau (Jones)
as 24-1549
Defendant:
HENRY JONES, XAVIER ARAU, CASSIUS MILLER and others
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
United States of America v. Hunter (Samia)
as 24-1553
Defendant:
ADAM SAMIA, JOSEPH MANUEL HUNTER, MICHAEL FILTER and others
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Dixon v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv04312
Petitioner:
Demark Dixon
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 cn Petition for Writ of Coram Nobis
Perez Sanchez v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv04023
Petitioner:
Ovidio Perez Sanchez
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
