Cases 31 - 40 of 2,729
Christian v. Lopez
as 24-1012
Plaintiff:
FERRIS CHRISTIAN
Defendant:
JULISSA LOPEZ, Branch Manager and CITIBANK, N.A.
United States of America v. Green (Johnson)
as 24-1017
Defendant:
DARRYL JOHNSON, NORMAN WORKMAN, CLAYTON GREEN and others
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Madera v. City of New York et al
as 1:2024cv02903
Plaintiff:
Antonio Madera
Defendant:
CITY OF NEW YORK, Craig W. Tiejen, William Arnold and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 U.S. Defendant
Lopez v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00349
Plaintiff:
Rahim Lopez
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Duarte Rodriguez v. Garland
as 24-929
Petitioner:
SONIA YULIETH DUARTE RODRIGUEZ, DIEGO STEVEN LOPEZ MORENO, ANDRES ESTEBAN LOPEZ DUARTE and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
United States of America v. Velez (Garcia)
as 24-923
Defendant:
JONATHAN GARCIA, CARMELO VELEZ, CHRISTOPHER RODRIGUEZ and others
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Ortiz Lopez v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00317
Plaintiff:
Deborah Ortiz Lopez
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Lopez-Perez v. Chef Toribio #2 Restaurant Corp. et al
as 1:2024cv02632
Plaintiff:
Margarita Lopez-Perez
Defendant:
Chef Toribio #2 Restaurant Corp. doing business as Chef Toribio 2 and Ronaldo Toribio
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02635
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02551
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1201 Civil Rights (Disability)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
