Cases 31 - 40 of 251
Savage v. United States of America et al
as 7:2022cv02595
Plaintiff:
Diane Savage
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 8715 Claims against the US - Jurisdiction of Courts
Abagnale v. Kornstein et al
as 7:2022cv00611
Plaintiff:
Jason Frank Abagnale
Defendant:
Michael A. Kornstein, Cooper Erving & Savage LLP and Citizens Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Hendrickson v. NeoPhotonics Corporation et al
as 1:2021cv06919
Plaintiff:
James Hendrickson
Defendant:
NeoPhotonics Corporation, Timothy S. Jenks, Charles J. Abbe and others
The New York Times Company et al v. Federal Bureau of Investigation
as 1:2021cv10888
Plaintiff:
The New York Times Company and Charlie Savage
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Investigation
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
The New York Times Company et al v. United States Department of Defense
as 1:2021cv10980
Plaintiff:
The New York Times Company, Mark Mazzetti and Charlie Savage
Defendant:
United States Department of Defense
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Savage v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2022cv00016
Plaintiff:
Amanda Savage
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Smith v. NeoPhotonics Corporation et al
as 1:2021cv10698
Plaintiff:
Heather Smith
Defendant:
NeoPhotonics Corporation, Timothy S. Jenks, Charles J. Abbe and others
Hopkins v. NeoPhotonics Corporation et al
as 1:2021cv10725
Plaintiff:
Matthew Hopkins
Defendant:
NeoPhotonics Corporation, Timothy S. Jenks, Charles J. Abbe and others
Ryan v. NeoPhotonics Corporation et al
as 1:2022cv00046
Plaintiff:
John Ryan
Defendant:
NeoPhotonics Corporation, Timothy S. Jenks, Charles J. Abbe and others
Wang v. NeoPhotonics Corporation et al
as 1:2021cv10338
Plaintiff:
Elaine Wang
Defendant:
NeoPhotonics Corporation, Timothy S. Jenks, Charles J. Abbe and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
