Cases 41 - 50 of 323
Acevedo v. St. Andrews Estates 26 LLC
as 1:2022cv04682
Plaintiff:
Juan Acevedo
Defendant:
St. Andrews Estates 26 LLC
Cause Of Action: 11 U.S.C. § 101 Bankruptcy
United States of America v. Jordan (Santos)
as 22-1714
Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant:
Keith Jordan, AKA Knowledge, Brian Hanna, AKA Zo, Katina Reed, AKA Tina and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Pedro Santos, AKA Primo
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv06620
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12188 Americans With Disabilities Act - Civil Enforcement Actions
Emrith et. al v. iMobile, LLC et al
as 1:2022cv03704
Plaintiff:
Sherry Emrith, Rood Lebrun, Samantha Sutton and others
Defendant:
iMobile, LLC and iMobile USA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Emrith et. al v. iMobile, LLC et al
as 2:2022cv03704
Plaintiff:
Sherry Emrith, Rood Lebrun, Samantha Sutton and others
Defendant:
iMobile, LLC and iMobile USA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Acevedo v. Keurig Dr Pepper, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv02157
Plaintiff:
Edwin Derick Morales Acevedo
Defendant:
Keurig Dr Pepper, Inc. and Dr Pepper/Seven Up, Inc.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv02041
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Acevedo v. Garland
as 22-6170
Petitioner:
REINA ISABEL ACEVEDO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Acevedo v. Trader Joe's East, Inc.
as 1:2022cv02024
Plaintiff:
Alex Acevedo
Defendant:
Trader Joe's East, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 lr Diversity - Labor
United States Court Security Officers et al v. United States Marshals Service
as 1:2022cv01380
Plaintiff:
United States Court Security Officers, Alejandro Acevedo, Frank Forster and others
Defendant:
United States Marshals Service
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
