Cases 41 - 50 of 2,287
Honigman v. Kimberly-Clark Corporation
as 24-454
Plaintiff:
GLADYS HONIGMAN, Individually and on behalf of all others Similarly situated and D. JOSEPH KURTZ
Appellant:
THEODORE H. FRANK
Defendant:
KIMBERLY-CLARK CORPORATION
Kurtz v. Kimberly-Clark Corporation
as 24-425
Plaintiff:
D. JOSEPH KURTZ, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated
Appellant:
THEODORE H. FRANK
Defendant:
KIMBERLY-CLARK CORPORATION and COSTCO WHOLESALE CO.
Bradshaw v. Annucci
as 24-416
Defendant:
GRAVELL, Mental Health Therapist, Upstate Correctional Facility, R. BARBOSA, CHO, Mid-State Correctional Facility, R. CANTWELL, Commissioner Hearing Officer, Upstate Correctional Facility and others
Plaintiff:
JAY BRADSHAW
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01302
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 ed Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
American Express Company v. Oliver
as 24-317
Petitioner:
AMERICAN EXPRESS COMPANY and AMERICAN EXPRESS TRAVEL RELATED SERVICES COMPANY, INC.
Respondent:
ANTHONY OLIVER, TERRY GAYLE QUINTON, SHAWN O'KEEFE and others
Clarke v. Exactech, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00918
Plaintiff:
Vanessa T. Clarke
Defendant:
Exactech, Inc., Exactech U.S., Inc., TPG Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
United States of America v. Clark
as 24-290
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
ALLEN R. CLARK
Hafner v. Scott et al
as 2:2024cv00165
Plaintiff:
Eric Hafner
Defendant:
Phillip B. Scott, Charity R. Clark and Sarah Copeland Hanzas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Clark v. PowerFleet, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00781
Plaintiff:
Joseph Clark
Defendant:
PowerFleet, Inc., Michael Brodsky, Steve Towe and others
Clark v. Vibe Media Publishing, LLC
as 1:2024cv00786
Plaintiff:
Dennis Clark
Defendant:
Vibe Media Publishing, LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
