Cases 41 - 50 of 1,961
Weiss v. Pioneer Natural Resources Company et al
as 1:2024cv00229
Plaintiff:
Steven Weiss
Defendant:
Pioneer Natural Resources Company, J. Kenneth Thompson, Richard P. Dealy and others
Mitchell et al v. Exactech Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00227
Plaintiff:
Clint Mitchell and Jessica Mitchell
Defendant:
Exactech Inc. and Exactech U.S., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Jenkins v. Immunogen, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00194
Plaintiff:
Shannon Jenkins
Defendant:
Immunogen, Inc., Stephen C. McCluski, Stuart A. Arbuckle and others
Mitchell v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00041
Plaintiff:
Marquita Mitchell
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company v. Heatwole et al
as 7:2024cv00202
Plaintiff:
Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company
Defendant:
Craig M Heatwole and Mitchell Heatwole
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 1 Personal Property
Atas v. The New York Times Company
as 24-58
Defendant / Appellee:
NEW YORK TIMES COMPANY, DEAN BAQUET, ELLEN POLLOCK and others
Defendant / Appellant:
NADIRE ATAS
Marek v. Immunogen, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00105
Plaintiff:
Gary Marek
Defendant:
Immunogen, Inc., Stephen C. McCluski, Stuart A. Arbuckle and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00051
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00061
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Saracina et al v. Haendiges et al
as 6:2024cv06005
Plaintiff:
Scott A. Saracina, Perez Authtry, Jason Mitchell and others
Defendant:
Deborah A. Haendiges, Shelia O'Sullivan Thie and John J. Flynn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
