Cases filed in the Second Circuit Courts
Cases 41 - 50 of 467
Ferguson et al v. City of New York et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv01000
Plaintiff: Ronisha Ferguson, S.J. and A.J.
Defendant: THE CITY OF NEW YORK, KerryAnne Graham, Alphy Contreras and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 dp Civil Right Denial of Due Process
Graham v. City of New York We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv10655
Plaintiff: SHAMAREE GRAHAM
Defendant: CITY OF NEW YORK, POLICE OFFICER J. LINDQUIST, POLICE OFFICER SHAWN A ROMERO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roundtree v. City of New York et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv10576
Plaintiff: My'Asha Roundtree
Defendant: CITY OF NEW YORK, Concourse House Development Fund Company, Inc., Police Officer Andy Urena and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 cv
Fletcher v. City of New York et al
as 1:2021cv10755
Plaintiff: Liam Fletcher
Defendant: CITY OF NEW YORK, Bekim Kalicovic, Sean Kwalwasser and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lindsey Adelman Studio LLC et al v. Lucretia Lighting PTY, LTD et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv09423
Defendant: JAS Industries, LTD., Lucretia Lighting PTY, LTD, Replica Lights and others
Plaintiff: Lindsey Adelman Studio LLC and Lindsey Adelman
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44
Allen v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2021cv06473
Plaintiff: Bradley Allen
Defendant: The City of New York, Bill De Blasio, Dermot Shea, Commissioner of the New York City Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mattel Inc. v. The Entities Doing Business as Goodmenow at the URL Goodmenow.com et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv11075
Defendant: The Entities Doing Business as Goodmenow at the URL Goodmenow.com, John Doe Nos 1-5, The Entities Doing Business as Meetgoodtimes at the URLMeetgoodtimes.com and others
Plaintiff: ABC and Mattel Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Government Employees Insurance Company et al v. Satya Drug Corp. et al
as 1:2021cv06207
Plaintiff: Government Employees Insurance Company, GEICO Indemnity Company, GEICO General Insurance Company and others
Defendant: Satya Drug Corp. doing business as Farmacia Central, RKD RX Corp., Michael Bassanell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Trustees of the New York City District Council of Carpenters Pension Fund, Welfare Fund, Annuity Fund, Apprenticeship, Journeyman Retraining, Educational and Industry Fund et al v. Advanced Construction Equipment Corp., et al
as 1:2021cv08377
Plaintiff: Trustees of the New York City District Council of Carpenters Pension Fund, Welfare Fund, Annuity Fund, Apprenticeship, Journeyman Retraining, Educational and Industry Fund, Trustees of the New York City Carpenters Relief and Charity Fund and The Carpenter Contractor Alliance of Metropolitan New York
Defendant: Advanced Construction Equipment Corp.,, S&N Builders, Inc., Spring Roc LLC. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Trustees of the New York City District Council of Carpenters Pension Fund, Welfare Fund, Annuity Fund, Apprenticeship, Journeyman Retraining, Educational and Industry Fund et al v. Symphony Floors Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv05944
Plaintiff: Trustees of the New York City District Council of Carpenters Pension Fund, Welfare Fund, Annuity Fund, Apprenticeship, Journeyman Retraining, Educational and Industry Fund, Trustees Of The New York City Carpenters Relief and Charity Fund and The Carpenter Contractor Alliance of Metropolitan New York
Defendant: Symphony Floors Inc., Prismatic Development Corporation, Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland/Zurich American Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?