Cases filed in the Second Circuit Courts
Cases 41 - 50 of 141
Ruddock v. Wolf
as 20-2140
Respondent / Appellee: Jeffrey Searls, in his official capacity as Administrator, Buffalo Federal Detention Facility, Chad F. Wolf, Acting Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security Office of the Executive Secretary and Thomas E. Feeley, in his official capacity as Field Office Director, Buffalo Field Office, U. S. Immigration & Customs Enforcement
Petitioner / Appellant: Kevin Ruddock
Gutierrez v. Dubois
as 20-2041
Respondent / Appellee: Matthew Albence, in his official capacity as the Acting Director for U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Francis Russo, Area Director, Bureau of Immigration & Customs Enforcement, JFK Port of Entry, Chad F. Wolf, in his official capacity as Acting Secretary of Homeland Security and others
Petitioner / Appellant: Ramon Gutierrez
Respondent: Kevin McAleenan, Acting Secretary, Department of Homeland Security and Donald D. Vitiello, District Director, Bureau of Immigration & Customs Enforcement
Basank v. Decker
as 20-1966
Petitioner: Milton Barbecho, Vasif Basank, "Vincent", Job Velasquez Estrada and others
Respondent: Director Thomas Decker, in his official capacity as Director of the New York Field Office of U.S. Immigration & Customs Enforcement and Acting Secretary Chad F. Wolf, in his official capacity as Acting Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security
Rosemond v. Decker
as 20-1825
Respondent: Director Thomas Decker, in his official capacity as Field Office Director, New York City Field Office, U.S. Immigration & Customs Enforcement, Attorney General William P. Barr, n his official capacity as Attorney General, U.S. Department of Justice, Acting Secretary Kevin McAleenan, in his official capacity as Acting Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security and others
Petitioner: Jean Rosemond
Mathurin v. Barr
as 20-1810
Respondent: Chad F. Wolf, in his official capacity as Acting Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Jeffrey Searls, in his official capacity as Acting Assistant Field Office Director and Administrator, Buffalo Federal Detention Facility, Thomas E. Feeley, in his official capacity as Field Office Director, Buffalo Field Office, U.S. Immigration & Customs Enforcement and others
Petitioner: Ravely Junior Mathurin
Guerrero v. Decker
as 20-1615
Petitioner: Domingo Guerrero
Respondent: Thomas Decker, in his official capacity as Field Office Director, New York City Field Office, U.S. Immigration & Customs Enforcement, Chad F. Wolf, in his official capacity as Acting Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security and William P. Barr, in his official capacity as Attorney General, U.S. Department of Justice
Rodriguez et al v. Barr et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv00424
Respondent: Chad Wolf, Immigrations & Customs Enforcement, Thomas Decker and others
Petitioner: Olvin Geovany Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Cabanillas Lazo v. Decker
as 20-1140
Respondent: Chad F. Wolf, in his official capacity as Acting Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, William P. Barr, in his official capacity as Attorney General, U.S. Department of Justice and Thomas Decker, in his official capacity as Field Office Director, New York City Field Office, U.S. Immigration & Customs Enforcement
Petitioner: Jim Marco Cabanillas Lazo
Beswick et al v. Barr et al
as 1:2020cv02765
Respondent: Chad Wolf, Immigrations & Customs Enforcement, U.S. Department of Homeland Security and others
Petitioner: Dirkis Castrillo-Castrillo, Olvin Geovany Rodriguez, Yoscal Mogena-Jimenez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv02129
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 in

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?