Cases 41 - 50 of 121
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv02971
Lead Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 fd Removal - Fair Debt Collection Practices Act
Sandoval et al v. Sonaal Industries, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv02576
Defendant:
Michael Besse, Metropolitan Avenue Associates, Inc., Manjula Mukhopadhyay and others
Plaintiff:
Marcos Antonio Sandoval
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Ramirez et al v. Judd et al
as 2:2019cv01397
Plaintiff:
Jaime Ramirez and Ovidio Sandoval
Defendant:
Gene Judd and Bellmore Gardens, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Anobile v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
as 1:2018cv11939
Plaintiff:
Donna Anobile, Steven Bodarky, April Hall and others
Defendant:
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A
Amato et al v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
as 1:2018cv11849
Plaintiff:
James Quinlivan, Susan DeMaio, Jimmie Lee Boyles and others
Defendant:
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A
Sandoval et al v. Lincoln Property Company Commercial, Inc.
as 7:2018cv11796
Plaintiff:
Michael Sandoval
Defendant:
Lincoln Property Company Commercial, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Agri et al v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
as 1:2018cv11619
Plaintiff:
John Craney, Richard Rodriguez, Stephen Wheeler and others
Defendant:
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv11424
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1445
Diop v. Sandoval et al
as 1:2018cv04504
Defendant:
GJS Transport LLC and German Sandoval
Plaintiff:
Charles Pierre Diop
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv06240
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
