Cases 41 - 50 of 167
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv02181
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12188
Geng v. Shu Han Ju Restaurant II Corp et al
as 1:2018cv12220
Defendant:
John Hwang, Shu Han Ju Restaurant, LLC, Shu Han Ju Restaurant II Corp and others
Plaintiff:
Lijun Geng
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv09727
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv00136
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
United States of America v. Kinyon (Antonmarchi)
as 18-2118
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Malcom Kinyon, AKA Angel Rafael Rios-Zayas, AKA Sean Williams, AKA "M.A.", Star Bermudez, Brian Bowman, AKA Pony and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Eric Antonmarchi, AKA Powerful, AKA "P"
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv00027
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv00029
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv00028
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
United States of America v. Conyers
as 17-3628
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Ramel Matthews, AKA Rah, Wendell Belle, AKA Delly Dell, William Bracey, AKA Rel and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Rashaad Conyers, AKA Houle
United States of America v. Conyers (Moye)
as 17-3227
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Rashaad Conyers, AKA Houle, Ramel Matthews, AKA Rah, Anthony Scott, AKA Tyson and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Jason Moye, AKA Tall Jay
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
