Cases 51 - 60 of 144
Perez v. Westchester County et al
as 1:2018cv04163
Plaintiff:
Jorge Perez
Defendant:
Westchester County, Global Tel-Link/Advance Pay Services, Aramark and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lewis v. Westchester County et al
as 1:2018cv04086
Plaintiff:
Bruce Lewis
Defendant:
Westchester County, Global Tel-Link, Aramark Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mercedes v. Westchester County et al
as 1:2018cv04087
Plaintiff:
Leibys Mercedes
Defendant:
Westchester County, Global Tel-Link, Advance Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McCray v. Westchester County et al
as 7:2018cv03494
Plaintiff:
Johnny McCray
Defendant:
Westchester County, Kevin M. Cheverko, Aramark Correctional Services, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bethune v. Westchester County et al
as 1:2018cv03500
Plaintiff:
Andrew Bethune
Defendant:
Westchester County, Kevin M. Cheverko, Aramark Correctional Services, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mateo v. Westchester County et al
as 7:2018cv03499
Plaintiff:
Franklin Mateo
Defendant:
Westchester County , Kevin M. Cheverko , Aramark Correctional Services, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Spotard v. Westchester County et al
as 1:2018cv03498
Plaintiff:
Daniel Spotard
Defendant:
Westchester County, Kevin M. Cheverko, Aramark Correctional Services, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barnett v. Westchester County et al
as 1:2018cv02483
Plaintiff:
Jerome Barnett
Defendant:
Westchester County, Kevin M. Cheverko, Aramark Correctional Services, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ford v. Aramark et al
as 1:2018cv02696
Plaintiff:
Kavon Ford
Defendant:
Aramark, Kevin Cheverko and Westchester County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hoffstead v. Aramark Correctional Services et al
as 1:2018cv02381
Plaintiff:
Eric Hoffstead
Defendant:
Aramark Correctional Services, Donna Blackman, Shenelle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
