Cases 51 - 60 of 70
Catskill Mountains Chapter of v. United States Environmental Pr
as 14-2016
Plaintiff:
Catskill Mountains Chapter of Trout Unlimited, Inc., Theodore Gordon Flyfishers, Inc., Catskill-Deleware Natural Water Alliance, Inc. and others
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Government of the Province of Manitoba, Canada
Defendant:
State of Texas, State of Alaska, State of Idaho and others
Defendant - Appellee:
States of Colorado, New Mexico, et al., Central Arizona Water Conservation District, City and County of San Francisco Public Utilities Commission and others
Defendant - Appellant:
South Florida Water Management District
Catskill Mountains Chapter of v. United States Environmental Pr
as 14-1909
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Catskill Mountains Chapter of Trout Unlimited, Inc., Theodore Gordon Flyfishers, Inc., Catskill-Deleware Natural Water Alliance, Inc. and others
Defendant:
United States Environmental Protection Agency, Stephen L. Johnson, in his official capacity as ADMINISTRATOR OF THE UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, City of New York and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Central Arizona Water Conservation District, City and County of Denver, by and through its Board of Water Commissioners, Central Utah Water Conservancy District and others
Catskill Mountains Chapter of v. United States Environmental Pr
as 14-1823
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Catskill Mountains Chapter of Trout Unlimited, Inc., Theodore Gordon Flyfishers, Inc., Catskill-Deleware Natural Water Alliance, Inc. and others
Defendant:
State of Texas, State of Alaska, State of Idaho and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Stephen L. Johnson, in his official capacity as Administrator of the United States Environmental Protection Agency and South Florida Water Management District
Defendant - Appellant-Cross-Appellee:
States of Colorado, New Mexico, et al., Central Arizona Water Conservation District, City and County of San Francisco Public Utilities Commission and others
State of Texas v. Penguin Group (USA) Inc.
as 14-61
Plaintiff - Appellee:
State of Texas, State of Connecticut, State of Alaska and others
Defendant:
Penguin Group (USA) Inc., Simon & Schuster, Inc., Simon & Schuster Digital Sales, Inc. and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Apple Inc.
In Re: Electronic Books Antitr
as 13-4828
Plaintiff - Appellee:
The State of Arizona, The State of Alaska, The State of Arkansas and others
Defendant:
Simon & Schuster Digital Sales, Inc.
Defendant - Appellee:
MacMillian, Inc, Random House Inc., Hachette Book Group and others
Objector - Appellant:
Bob Kohn
The State of Texas v. Penguin Group (USA) Inc.
as 13-3867
Plaintiff - Appellee:
The State of Texas, The State of Connecticut, The State of Alaska and others
Defendant:
Penguin Group (USA) Inc., Simon & Schuster Digital Sales, Inc., Apple Inc. and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Holtzbrinck Publishers, LLC
The State of Texas v. Penguin Group (USA) Inc.
as 13-3864
Plaintiff - Appellee:
The State of Texas, The State of Connecticut, The State of Alaska and others
Defendant:
Penguin Group (USA) Inc., Holtzbrinck Publishers, LLC, AKA Macmillian and Apple Inc.
Defendant - Appellant:
Simon & Schuster, Inc. and Simon & Schuster Digital Sales, Inc.
The State of Texas v. Penguin Group (USA) Inc.
as 13-3857
Plaintiff - Appellee:
The State of Texas, The State of Connecticut, The State of Alaska and others
Defendant:
Penguin Group (USA) Inc.
Defendant - Appellant:
Apple Inc., Simon & Schuster, Inc., Simon & Schuster Digital Sales, Inc. and others
In Re: Penguin Group USA, Inc.
as 13-1744
Petitioner:
Penguin Group USA, Inc.
Respondent:
The State of Alabama, The State of Arkansas, The State of Colorado and others
In Re: Electronic Books Antitr
as 12-2999
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Shilpa Grover, Fredric A. Press, Anthony Petru and others
Defendant:
MacMillian, Inc, Harpercollins Publishers, Random House Inc. and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Penguin Group USA, Inc.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
