Cases 61 - 70 of 160
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv04847
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv04024
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv02263
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv01692
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Dewar v. United States of America
as 7:2017cv02330
Defendant:
United States of America
Plaintiff:
Donahue Dewar
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv01322
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00830
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Donahue v. Colvin
as 6:2016cv06838
Plaintiff:
Jacklyn M. Donahue
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
D'Angelo v. Annucci et al
as 1:2016cv06459
Plaintiff:
Guido D'Angelo
Defendant:
Anthony Annucci, Ann Mary T. Sullivan, Gilbert Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rivera et al v. Communications Workers of America et al
as 1:2016cv01673
Plaintiff:
Linda K. Atkinson, Cletane Cleo Bazile, Anna Birardi and others
Defendant:
Communications Workers of America, Communications Workers of America-International Brotherhood of Teamsters Passenger Service Employees Association, International Brotherhood of Teamsters and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
