Cases filed in the Second Circuit Courts
Cases 61 - 70 of 1,020
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2024cv00390
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02234
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01289
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Pady et al v. Jaddou et al
as 1:2024cv01370
Plaintiff: Fekri Abdo Ahmed Pady, Thoraya Abdullah Mohamed Aklan, H.F.A.P. and others
Defendant: Director UR JADDOU, Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas, Secretary Antony Blinken and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01221
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1153 Immigration: Allocation of Immigrant Visas
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01019
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1255 Immigration: Failure USCIS To Adjudicate Permanent Residency Petition
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01494
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00705
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01686
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00669
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?