Cases 71 - 80 of 164
Morales v. Home Depot USA Inc et al
as 3:2017cv00907
Plaintiff:
Caroll Morales
Defendant:
Home Depot USA Inc and Diversified Maintenance Systems, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bruscani v. Central Mutual Insurance Company, et al
as 1:2017cv00485
Plaintiff:
Mark Bruscani
Defendant:
Central Mutual Insurance Company , Michael Bruscani, Home Depot, USA, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00353
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Yakubov v. Home Depot USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv00522
Defendant:
Home Depot USA, Inc., The Home Depot and The Home Depot Special Services, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Robert Yakubov
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Sabourin v. Home Depot USA Inc
as 3:2016cv01814
Plaintiff:
Donna Sabourin
Defendant:
Home Depot USA Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv01489
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Merrimack Mutual Fire Ins Co v. Performance Coatings Inc. et al
as 3:2016cv01480
Defendant:
Performance Coatings Inc, Performance Coatings Inc. and Home Depot USA Inc
Plaintiff:
Merrimack Mutual Fire Ins Co
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
Adler v. The Home Depot USA, Inc.
as 2:2016cv04569
Plaintiff:
Daniel Adler
Defendant:
The Home Depot USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv03024
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Discriminatory practices affecting US Senate employees
Logan v. Home Depot USA, Inc.
as 1:2016cv04111
Plaintiff:
Patricia Logan
Defendant:
Home Depot USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
