Cases 1 - 10 of 543,778
Torres v. Starbucks Corporation d/b/a Starbucks Coffee Company et al
as 1:2024cv03945
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 pi Diversity-Personal Injury
Revi v. O'Malley, Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv03958
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Rev. of Final Dec. of Sec. of HEW re: S.S. Benefits
New York Mart CT, Inc. v. ABC Refrigeration and HVAC, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00910
Plaintiff:
New York Mart CT, Inc.
Defendant:
ABC Refrigeration and HVAC, Inc., ABC Refrigeration and HVAC, LLC and Coolsys Commercial and Industrial Solutions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00905
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00908
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00911
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Back v. New Haven Ramen, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00906
Defendant:
Doyeon Kim, New Haven Ramen, Inc. doing business as Kuro Shiro, Kogi Sarang Inc. doing business as Love Meat Korean BBQ and others
Plaintiff:
Jaeyeon Back
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
DATAONLINE, L.L.C. v. TREBAOL
as 1:2024cv03906
Plaintiff:
DATAONLINE, L.L.C.
Defendant:
LOUIS TREBAOL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 bc Diversity-Breach of Contract
Davolio et al v. The 3M Company et al
as 1:2024cv03917
Defendant:
The 3M Company, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Co., AGC Chemicals Americas Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Diane Davolio, Julie Dils, Edward Ehlers and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal - Suit against Federal Officer
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
