Cases 1 - 10 of 16,842
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03651
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03679
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Miller v. U.S. Postal Inspection Service
as 24-1366
Plaintiff:
PARIS M. MILLER
Defendant:
UNITED STATES POSTAL INSPECTION SERVICE, DAMIAN WILLIAMS and U.S. ATTORNEY OF NYS SOUTHERN DISTRICT
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03632
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03644
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Johnson v. State of New York Corporate et al
as 1:2024cv03922
Plaintiff:
Michael A. Johnson, II
Defendant:
State of New York Corporate, State Judicial Systems of New York and City Legal System New York Police and District Attorney's Bronx/Manhattan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03650
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03642
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Sikder v. Garland
as 24-1362
Petitioner:
MOHAMMED LOKMAN SIKDER, FARJANA AKTER, MOHAMMED SAFWAN SIKDER and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Rodriguez-Cecias v. Garland
as 24-1367
Petitioner:
DONNY ANDRE RODRIGUEZ-CECIAS, KARLA STEPHANIE MIRANDA-MANRIQUE and EITHAN SEBASTIAN RODRIGUEZ-MIRANDA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
