Cases filed in the Second Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Cohen v. Atlantic Richfield Company et al
as 6:2022cv06395
Plaintiff: Mark A Cohen
Defendant: Atlantic Richfield Company and BP America Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection v. Amerada Hess Corp. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2008cv00312
Special Master: Ronald J. Hedges
Plaintiff: New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection, The Commisisoner of the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection, The Administrator of the New Jersey Spill Compensation Fund and others
Defendant: Amerada Hess Corp., Rosemore Inc., Getty Properties Corp. and others
3Rd Party Defendant: Harbans Singh, Gurmail Singh and John and Jane Does Nos. 1-100
Not Classified By Court: Experimental Pathology Laboratories, Inc.
Cross Defendant: H.P. Delta, Inc.
Cross Claimant: Robert Melecci and Dhandi Transport, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Other
Town of East Hampton v. Amerada Hess Corp.
as 1:2004cv01720
Defendant: Atlantic Richfield Company doing business as Arco Products Company formerly known as Arco Petroleum Co. also known as Arco, BP Amoco Chemical Company, BP Products North America, Inc. and others
Special Master: Ronald J. Hedges
Plaintiff: Town of East Hampton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 pi Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Patrick County School Board v. Amerada Hess Corporation
as 1:2004cv02070
Defendant: BP Amoco Chemical Company, El Paso Corporation, Getty Properties Corporation and others
Special Master: Ronald J. Hedges
Plaintiff: Patrick County School Board
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 pi Fed. Question: Personal Injury
City Of New York v. Exxon Mobil Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv04807
Defendant: ExxonMobil Oil Corporation, BP America Inc., Exxon Mobil Corporation and others
Plaintiff: City Of New York and The City of New York
Amicus Curiae: Energy Policy Advocates
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2019cv10323
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
The City of New York v. Amerada Hess Corp.
as 1:2004cv03417
Defendant: El Paso CGP Company doing business as Coastal Oil New York, Inc. formerly known as Coastal Corporation, TRMI Holdings Inc., Marathon Ashland Petroleum LLC and others
Plaintiff: Water Finance Agency, The Water Board and The City of New York
Petitioner: Gary Stumpf, Thomas M Milton, Meena Nainan and others
Material Witne: Barker Hamill
Special Master: Ronald J. Hedges
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 pi Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Sevy v. BP PLC, et al
as 1:2013cv03587
Plaintiff: Michael Sevy
Defendant: BP PLC,, Royal Sutch Shell PLC,, Statoil ASA and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation (Monopolizing Trade)
White Oaks Fund LP v. BP PLC et al
as 1:2013cv04553
Plaintiff: White Oaks Fund LP
Defendant: BP PLC, Royal Dutch Shell plc, Statoil ASA and others
Cause Of Action: 7 U.S.C. § 25 Fraud - Commodities Leverage Contracts
In re: North Sea Brent Crude O We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 17-2233
Plaintiff: Michael Sevy, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated,, Gregory H. Smith, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Patricia Benvenuto, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated and others
Plaintiff - Appellant: Prime International Trading, Ltd., on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated, White Oaks Fund LP, On behalf of itself and all others similarly situated, Kevin McDonnell, On behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and others
Defendant - Appellee: BP PLC, Trafigura Beheer B.V., Trafigura AG and others
Defendant: Royal Dutch Shell Plc, Statoil ASA, John Doe 1 and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?