Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Banton v. United Cerebral Palsy Associations Of New York State, Inc.
as 1:2022cv08338
Plaintiff:
Shackeema Banton
Defendant:
United Cerebral Palsy Associations Of New York State, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 020
Davis v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2016cv07742
Plaintiff:
Steven Davis
Defendant:
The City of New York, New York City Department of Corrections, Jane/John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. The City Of New York , et al
as 1:2016cv07369
Plaintiff:
Steven Davis
Defendant:
The City Of New York, NYC DOC Administrative Jane Doe, NYC DOC Administrative John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Boone v. Brown et al
as 1:2012cv05871
Defendant:
C.O. Banton, C.O. Barnes and C.O. Brown
Plaintiff:
Daniel Boone
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Boone v. City of New York
as 1:2012cv02119
Defendant:
C.O. Banton, C.O. Barnes, C.O. Brown and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Boone
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dilworth et al v. Goldberg et al
as 1:2010cv02224
Plaintiff:
Anthony G. Dilworth and Patricia Dilworth
Defendant:
Randy Goldberg, M.D., Westchester County, Westchester County Health Care Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Dilworth et al v. Goldberg et al
as 7:2010cv02224
Plaintiff:
Anthony G. Dilworth and Patricia Dilworth
Defendant:
Randy Goldberg, M.D., Westchester County, Westchester County Health Care Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Dilworth et al v. Goldberg et al
as 1:2010cv02224
Plaintiff:
Anthony G. Dilworth and Patricia Dilworth
Defendant:
Randy Goldberg, M.D., Westchester County, Westchester County Health Care Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Banton v. Schuck et al
as 1:2007cv00427
Plaintiff:
Gilmore Banton
Defendant:
J. Schuck, J. Hupkowicz, K. Berbary and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
