Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Pineda v. Rotary Lift et al
as 1:2023cv02405
Plaintiff:
Julio Pineda
Defendant:
Rotary Lift, Vehicle Service Group, LLC and Dover Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 pl Diversity-Product Liability
Cuellar v. The Heil Co. et al
as 1:2017cv01073
Plaintiff:
Rafael Cuellar
Defendant:
Bayne Machine Works, Inc. , Dover Corporation and Heil Environmental Industries, Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Saffold v. Giles et al (INMATE1)
as 1:2007cv00598
Plaintiff:
Scholastic Inc. and Dover Corporation
Defendant:
M/V Kitano, Nippon Yusen Kaisha , P&O Nedlloyd Ltd. and others
Cross_claimant:
Nippon Yusen Kaisha , Hapag-Lloyd Container Linie, GmbH and P&O Nedlloyd Ltd.
Cross_defendant:
General Carbon Corp.
Thirdparty_plaintiff:
General Carbon Corp.
Thirdparty_defendant:
Rose Container Line, Inc. , North American Van Lines, Inc., Sirva Freight Forwarding, Inc. and others
Counter_claimant:
Navtrans Intermodal Freight Forwarding Services Inc. and Navtrans International Freight Forwarding, Inc.
Counter_defendant:
General Carbon Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Laudero v. Dover Corporation et al
as 1:2010cv00054
Plaintiff:
Lisa A. Laudero
Defendant:
Dover Corporation, Thyssenkrupp Elevator Corporation, Thyssenkrupp Elevator Americas Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Flynn v. Dover Corporation et al
as 1:2010cv00053
Plaintiff:
Theresa A. Flynn
Defendant:
Dover Corporation, Thyssenkrupp Elevator Corporation, Thyssenkrupp Elevator Americas Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Gilbert et al v. Detroit Diesel Corp., et al
as 1:2009cv00962
Defendant:
Mack Trucks, Inc., Hercules Engine Inc., Blackmer and others
Plaintiff:
Betty Gilbert and Joseph W. Gilbert
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
