Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01367
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv06316
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv04837
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03951
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Donnelly v. Controlled Application Review
as 20-4243
Respondent / Appellee:
United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, Jeffrey A. Rosen, Acting United States Attorney General, L. Francis Cissna, Director of the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services and others
Petitioner / Appellant:
Mr. Patrick J. Donnelly
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv10866
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv10278
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv10295
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv06351
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Azatullah v. Wolf et al.
as 1:2020cv01069
Defendant:
Lee F Bowes, Acting Director of the New York District of the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, Chad W Wolf, Acting Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security, Kenneth T Cuccinelli, II, Acting Director of the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services and others
Plaintiff:
Ahmad Seir Azatullah
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 dj
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
