Cases filed in the Second Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 39
Pena Garcia v. United States Department of Labor
as 23-8066
Petitioner: LUIS PENA GARCIA
Respondent: Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, IMS INSURANCE COMPANY OF PUERTO RICO and CALZADILLA CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-805
Plaintiff / Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Allah v. Perlman
as 21-3026
Plaintiff / Appellant: Wamel Allah
Defendant / Appellee: L. Adams, Orc
Defendant: Kenneth Perlman, Former Deputy Commissioner for Program Services, Jeffery McKoy, Deputy Commissioner for Program Services, L. Woodward, Former Senior Counselor and others
James v. Cuny-John Jay College
as 21-2882
Plaintiff / Appellant: Terrell James
Defendant / Appellee: Neil Stewart, in their official capacities and Susan Jeffrey, in their official capacities
Defendant: John Jay College of Criminal Justice, Rajendra Singh, Director of Human Resources and in their official capacities, Donald V. Gray, Director, Office of Legal Counsel and in their official capacities and others
Rubin v. New York City Board of Educati
as 21-1979
Plaintiff / Appellant: Lise Rubin
Defendant / Appellee: New York City Board of Education, New York City Special Commission of Investigation, Anastasia Coleman, Commissioner of SCI and others
Defendant: Michael Biscogna, SCI Chief Investigator, Ilene Altschul, Superintendent, Manhattan District 3, Howard Friedman, General Counsel and others
Allah v. Perlman
as 21-1367
Plaintiff / Appellant: Wamel Allah
Defendant: John Doe, Former Counselor, Kenneth Perlman, Former Deputy Commissioner for Program Services, Kerri Martin, Orc and others
Defendant / Appellee: L. Latona, Sorc, J. Woodworth, Orc (SHU Director Prack), L. Adams, Orc and others
Kupfer v. Residential Mortgage Solution
as 21-65
Plaintiff / Appellant: Betty Ann Kupfer, AKA Betty Kupfer and Charles Kupfer
Defendant / Appellee: Servis One Inc., DBA BSI Financial Services, Jack Getzelman, individually and as Chief Financial Officer of Residential Mortgage Solution LLC and as Director / Officer of RMS Asset Management LLC, Specialized Loan Servicing LLC and others
Defendant: Rosicki, Rosicki & Associates PC and Mark Antos, Esq., individually and as an associate of Rosicki, Rosicki & Associates PC
Jones v. Cuomo We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-2174
Defendant / Appellee: Naomi Harrington, Director, Office of Mental Health, Katrina Colistra, Doctor of Psychology, Donna Hall, Acting Associate Commissioner, Office of Mental Health and others
Defendant: Records Coordinator, Fishkill Correctional Facility, Department of Corrections and Community Supervision, Eric T. Schneiderman, New York State Attorney General, Robert Conflitti, New York State, Assistant Attorney General and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: Daniel Jones
Falodun v. Barr
as 20-410
Respondent: Walter M. Ingram, Office of Enforcement and Removal Operations, Post Order Custody Review Unit Chief, Washington, D.C. Field Office, Sean Callagher, Designated Field Office Director, ERO Buffalo Federal Detention Facility, Thomas E. Feeley, Deputy Field Office Director, Office of Enforcement and Removal Operations Buffalo Field Office and others
Petitioner: Bright Idada Falodun
State of New York v. United States Department of He
as 20-41
Plaintiff / Appellee: State of Colorado, State of Illinois, State of New York and others
Defendant / Appellant: United States Department of Health and Human Services, Alex M. Azar, II, in his official capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services and United States of America
Defendant: Christian Medical and Dental Association, Roger T. Severino, in his official capacity as Director, Office for Civil Rights, United States Department of Health and Human Services, Dr. Regina Frost and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?