Cases 1 - 10 of 34
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 26-1968
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2026cv00423
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Krebs et al v. Webb et al
as 1:2025cv08676
Defendant:
The 3M Company, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Co., AGC Chemicals Americas Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Krebs, Shannon Willis, Jason Ehrenhaft and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal - Suit against Federal Officer
Hollin v. Scott et al
as 1:2025cv06414
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Hollin
Defendant:
Kimberly Scott, Phillip Holloman, Richard Burke and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1109 Breach of Fiduciary Duties
Hollin v. Behrens et al
as 1:2025cv05793
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Hollin
Defendant:
M. Kathleen Behrens, Richard J. Barry, Kathryn Boor and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 j(b)ss Stockholder Suit
United States of America v. Hollins
as 25-350
Defendant:
ANDREW HOLLINS and Andrew Jones
:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
United States of America v. Hollins
as 25-353
Defendant:
ANDREW HOLLINS and Andrew Jones
:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Hollin v. Schleifer et al
as 1:2025cv00651
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Hollin
Defendant:
Leonard S. Schleifer, Christopher Fenimore, Robert Landry and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Hollin v. Zaslav et al
as 1:2024cv09885
Defendant:
Richard W. Fisher, Paula A. Price, Debra L. Lee and others
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Hollin
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 j(b)ss Stockholder Suit
IN RE WARNER BROS. DISCOVERY, INC. DERIVATIVE LITIGATION
as 1:2024cv09856
Plaintiff:
Anand Roy, Lawrence Hollin, Kevin KO and others
Defendant:
David M. Zaslav, Gunnar Wiedenfels, Li Haslett Chen and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
