Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Dimitrov v. The United States of America et al
as 1:2023cv06451
Plaintiff:
Kalin G. Dimitrov
Defendant:
The United States of America, The City of New York, Township of Teaneck and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lara et al v. J & Z Food Mart and Supermarket Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv09152
Defendant:
Mohammad S. Hoque, Kalin, J & Z Food Mart and Supermarket Inc. doing business as Al-Aqsa Supermarket and others
Plaintiff:
Jorge Lara
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv03600
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Protostorm, Inc. v. Mound Cotton Wollan & Greenglass LLP et al
as 1:2018cv02107
Defendant:
Hilary M Henkind, Bruce R Kaliner, John F Parker and others
Plaintiff:
Protostorm, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Legal Malpractice
Glaser v. Colvin
as 2:2016cv00705
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Plaintiff:
Anne Kalin Glaser
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Kern-Guerriere et al v. Nassau County, New York et al
as 2:2011cv04991
Defendant:
Walter Camier, John Doe #1, John Doe #2 and others
Plaintiff:
Dr. John T. Guerriere and Barbara E. Kern-Guerriere
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2010cv01845
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kaliner et al v. Mt. Vernon Monetary Management Corp. et al
as 1:2007cv04643
Plaintiff:
Michael H. Kaliner and Barron ATM, LLC
Defendant:
Mt. Vernon Monetary Management Corp., Mt. Vernon Money Center Corp. and Barron ATM Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Kalin v. Xanboo, Inc. et al
as 1:2004cv05931
Plaintiff:
Edward Kalin
Defendant:
Xanboo, Inc. , Shenzhen RDI Electronics & Plastics Co., Ltd., Bob Diamond and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
