Cases 1 - 10 of 80
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv05701
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Williams et al v. The United States of America et al
as 1:2024cv05522
Defendant:
The United States Postal Service, Commercial Trailer Leasing, Inc., Tyrone Antonio Brown and others
Plaintiff:
Othniel Sheldon Cunningham and Andre Michael Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
United States of America v. Brown (Fremont)
as 24-1536
Defendant:
JEAN FREMONT, CHRISTIAN WILLIAMS, OLUWAGBENGA AGORO and others
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
United States of America v. Brown
as 24-1482
Defendant:
DAVON BROWN, CHRISTIAN WILLIAMS, OLUWAGBENGA AGORO and others
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
United States of America v. Brown (Bailey)
as 24-1037
Defendant:
LORENZO BAILEY, DAVON BROWN, CHRISTIAN WILLIAMS and others
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
United States of America v. Brown (Agoro)
as 24-984
Defendant:
OLUWAGBENGA AGORO, DAVON BROWN, CHRISTIAN WILLIAMS and others
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02582
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
United States of America v. Brown (Battice)
as 24-884
Defendant:
QUINCY BATTICE, DAVON BROWN, CHRISTIAN WILLIAMS and others
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
United States of America v. Ruegg (Williams)
as 24-786
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
MICHAEL WILLIAMS and RONALD RUEGG
Cunningham et al v. The United States of America et al
as 1:2023cv09141
Plaintiff:
OTHNIEL SHELDON CUNNINGHAM and ANDRE MICHAEL WILLIAMS
Defendant:
The United States of America, United States Postal Service, Commercial Trailer Leasing, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
