Cases 1 - 10 of 10
United States of America v. Pena (Hector Raymond Pena)
as 21-1199
Defendant:
Elyn Reynoso, AKA BB, Jose Pena, AKA Chelo, Omar Flores and others
Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Hector Raymond Pena, AKA C.O. Montana
United States of America v. Pena (Jose Pena)
as 20-4192
Defendant:
Hector Raymond Pena, AKA C.O. Montana, Elyn Reynoso, AKA BB, Omar Flores and others
Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Jose Pena, AKA Chelo
United States of America v. Guerrero (Cedeno)
as 17-800
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Antonio Guerrero, AKA Tony, Edwin Maldonado and Omar Flores
Defendant - Appellant:
Johnny Cedeno
Flores et al v. Benrose Restaurant, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv01429
Defendant:
Benrose Restaurant, Inc., Benedicto Dipietro, Claudio Dipietro and others
Plaintiff:
Omar Flores and Josue Ramirez
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
United States of America v. Guerrero (Maldonado)
as 12-5095
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Antonio Guerrero, AKA Tony, Omar Flores and Johnny Cedeno
Defendant - Appellant:
Edwin Maldonado
Flores v. Racette
as 12-3988
Petitioner - Appellant:
Omar Flores
Respondent - Appellee:
Stephen Racette, Superintendent
Flores v. Racette
as 1:2012cv03343
Petitioner:
Omar Flores
Respondent:
Superintendent Stephen Racette
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Flores v. Racette
as 1:2012cv03342
Petitioner:
Omar Flores
Respondent:
Superintendent Stephen Racette
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Flores v. Racette
as 1:2012cv04209
Petitioner:
Omar Flores
Respondent:
Stephen Racette
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Flores v. Racette
as 1:2012cv04121
Petitioner:
Omar Flores
Respondent:
Stephen Racette
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
