Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Pabon v. Penske Logistics Inc. Component Carrier LLC et al
as 1:2023cv08276
Plaintiff:
Felix A Pabon
Defendant:
Penske Logistics Inc. Component Carrier LLC, Johns Manville and James C Lawall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 nr Diversity: Notice of Removal
Gomez v. Advance Auto Parts, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv04127
Plaintiff:
Juana Maribel Gomez
Defendant:
Advance Auto Parts, Inc., Joseph Emiliano Perez, Penske Logistics LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv06694
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2015cv06694
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Mastronicola et al v. Penske Logistics, LLC et al
as 2:2014cv02161
Cross Claimant:
J.B. Hunt Transport Inc.
Defendant:
J.B. Hunt Transport Inc., Penske Logistics, Inc., Penske Logistics, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Mastronicola and Teresa Mastronicola
Cross Defendant:
Penske Logistics, Inc., Penske Logistics, LLC and Steelcase Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Mastronicola et al v. Penske Logistics, LLC et al
as 1:2014cv01832
Defendant:
J.B Hunt Transport Inc., Penske Logistics, Inc., Penske Logistics, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Mastronicola and Teresa Mastronicola
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2009cv01030
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Gorenflo v. Penske Logistics et al
as 5:2008cv00346
Plaintiff:
Sharon M. Gorenflo
Defendant:
Penske Logistics, Mark Cole, Barbara Miletics and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv00410
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
