Cases 1 - 10 of 18
None v. Garland
as 24-770
Petitioner:
POOJA NONE, KANISHKA NONE, KAMAKSHI NONE and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00169
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Sheth et al v. JPC Trucking LLC et al
as 1:2023cv08249
Plaintiff:
Pooja Sheth and Nivant Sheth
Defendant:
JPC Trucking LLC and Hamyl J. Zolotoff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv09011
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv07047
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Jentz v. Teachers Insurance and Annuity Association of America
as 1:2023cv06944
Plaintiff:
Gayle Jentz
Defendant:
Teachers Insurance and Annuity Association of America
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Andre Lopez, Robin Andersen, Gwendolyn Smuda and others
Consolidated Defendant:
Progress Software Corporation and Pension Benefit Information, LLC d/b/a PBI Research Services
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 ds Diversity-Contract Dispute
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00460
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv00174
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv02875
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Raamanuj v. Zaika Food Company LLC et al
as 1:2020cv04317
Defendant:
Mandeep S Oberoi, Zaika Food Company LLC, Pooja S Patel and others
Plaintiff:
Sharma Raamanuj
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
