Cases filed in the Second Circuit Courts
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00106
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Cuc et al v. Xiang Rong, Inc.
as 1:2021cv03857
Plaintiff: Gilberto Cuc and Carlos Hemberto Cuc
Defendant: Xiang Rong, Inc. and Rong Li
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Li v. Ichiban Mei Rong Li Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv00863
Plaintiff: Weidong Li
Defendant: Ichiban Mei Rong Li Inc. , Shu Jie Xiao and Mei Rong Li
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Zhu v. Ichiban Mei Rong Li Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv01264
Plaintiff: Yanping Zhu
Defendant: Ichiban Mei Rong Li Inc., Shu Jie Xiao, Mei Rong Li and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Li v. Holder
as 13-3826
Petitioner: Bao Lu Lin, AKA Bao Lv Lin and Rong Li
Respondent: Eric H. Holder, Jr., United States Attorney General
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00026
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
2875 Restaurant, Inc. et al v. Li et al
as 1:2010cv07194
Plaintiff: 2875 Restaurant, Inc., May Kwan Si, Inc., 1160 Third Avenue Food Service, Inc. and others
Defendant: Gui Ming Li , Hang Jian Chi , Guo Ping Li and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Li et al v. 2875 Restaurant, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2007cv02601
Plaintiff: Gui Ming Li, Gui Ming Li, Gui Ming Li and others
Defendant: 2875 Restaurant, Inc., May Kwan Si, Inc., 1160 Third Avenue Food Service, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Cen et al v. Ng et al
as 1:2007cv00650
Plaintiff: Wen Bin Cen, De Ping Chen, Wen Li Chen and others
Defendant: Mark Ng, Leila Ng, Rothstein & Hoffman International, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?