Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Hill v. NY State Fund Ins.
as 22-83
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Bonita Hill
Defendant / Appellee:
NY State Fund Ins.
Hill v. NY State Fund Ins.
as 5:2021cv01068
Plaintiff:
Bonita Hill
Defendant:
NY State Fund Ins.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 626 Job Discrimination (Age)
In Re: American International
as 10-950
Plaintiff:
Public Employees Retirement Association of New Mexico, Michael Feder, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Public Employees' Retirement System of Mississippi and others
Respondent:
PriceWaterhouseCoopers LLP, Ronald Ferguson, General Reinsurance Corporation and others
Petitioner-Cross-Respondent:
Ohio State Funds and II Ohio Public Employees Retirement System
Defendant:
Robert D. Jaffe, American International Group, Inc., Maurice Greenberg and others
In Re: American Internation Gr
as 10-847
Petitioner:
American International Group, Incorporation
Respondent:
Ohio State Funds, Ohio Public Employees Retirement System, Public Employees Retirement Association of New Mexico and others
Defendant:
Maurice Greenberg, Howard Smith, Thomas Tizzio and others
In Re: American International
as 10-849
Petitioner-Cross-Respondent:
American International Group, Incorporation
Respondent-Cross-Petitioner:
Ohio State Funds
United States of America v. The Sum of $48,000 in United States Funds et al
as 1:2009mc00062
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
The Sum of $48,000 in United States Funds, The Sum of $40,000 in United States Funds and One 2005 Buick Terraza, Vehicle Identification Number: 5GADX33L65D261851
United States of America v. The Sum of $75,000 in United States Funds et al
as 1:2008mc00002
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
The Sum of $75,000 in United States Funds, The Sum of $240,000 in United States Funds, The Sum of $7,000 in United States Funds and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
