Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Omni Elevator Corporation v. International Union of Elevato
as 22-806
Plaintiff:
Omni Elevator Corporation and Christian Goetting
Appellant:
John M. Regan, Jr. and Regan & McLaud, P.C.
Defendant / Appellee:
International Union of Elevator Constructors, International Union of Elevator Constructors Local 27, Alan Rothfuss and others
Defendant:
Delaware Elevator, Inc.
Trustees of the National Eleva v. The Elevator Guild, Inc.
as 22-799
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Trustees of the National Elevator Industry Pension, Health Benefit, Educational, Elevator Industry Work Preservation Funds, Elevator Constructors Annuity
Defendant / Appellant:
The Elevator Guild, Inc. and Christian Goetting
Omni Elevator Corporation v. International Union of Elevato
as 22-240
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Omni Elevator Corporation and Christian Goetting
Defendant / Appellee:
International Union of Elevator Constructors, International Union of Elevator Constructors Local 27, Alan Rothfuss and others
Omni Elevator Corporation et al v. International Union of Elevator Constructors et al
as 6:2019cv06778
Defendant:
Alan Rothfuss, Delaware Elevator, Inc., International Union of Elevator Constructors and others
Plaintiff:
Omni Elevator Corporation and Christian Goetting
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Trustees of the National Elevator Industry Pension, Health Benefit, Educational, Elevator Industry Work Preservation Funds et al v. Vertical Technologies of NY, LLC et al
as 5:2017mc00033
Plaintiff:
Trustees of the National Elevator Industry Pension, Health Benefit, Educational, Elevator Industry Work Preservation Funds and Elevator Constructors Annuity and 401(k) Retirement Plan
Defendant:
Vertical Technologies of NY, LLC and Michael P. Hills
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Trustees of the National Elevator Industry Pension, Health Benefit, Educational, Elevator Industry Work Preservation Funds et al v. Vertical Technologies of NY, LLC et al
as 5:2017mc00023
Plaintiff:
Trustees of the National Elevator Industry Pension, Health Benefit, Educational, Elevator Industry Work Preservation Funds and Elevator Constructors Annuity and 401(k) Retirement Plan
Defendant:
Vertical Technologies of NY, LLC and Michael P. Hills
Trustees of the National Elevator Industry Pension, Health Benefit, Educational, Elevator Industry Work Preservation Funds et al v. Metropolitan Enterprises Inc.
as 5:2017mc00006
Plaintiff:
Trustees of the National Elevator Industry Pension, Health Benefit, Educational, Elevator Industry Work Preservation Funds and Elevator Constructors Annuity and 401(k) Retirement Plan
Defendant:
Metropolitan Enterprises Inc.
Trustees of the National Elevator Industry Pension, Health Benefit, Educational, Elevator Industry Work Preservation Funds et al v. Gallagher Elevator Co., Inc.
as 1:2015mc00053
Plaintiff:
Trustees of the National Elevator Industry Pension, Health Benefit, Educational, Elevator Industry Work Preservation Funds and 401(k) Retirement Plan
Trustees of the National Elevator Industry Pension, Health Benefit, Educational, Elevator Industry Work Preservation Funds, Elevator Constructors Annuity v. The Elevator Guild, Inc. et al
as 6:2014mc06005
Plaintiff:
Trustees of the National Elevator Industry Pension, Health Benefit, Educational, Elevator Industry Work Preservation Funds, Elevator Constructors Annuity
Defendant:
The Elevator Guild, Inc. and Christian Goetting
Trustees of the National Elevator Industry Pension, Health Benefit, Educational, Elevator Industry Work Preservation Funds, Elevator Constructors Annuity and 401(k) Retirement Plan v. Independent Elevators, Inc.
as 1:2013cv05747
Defendant:
Independent Elevators, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Trustees of the National Elevator Industry Pension, Health Benefit, Educational, Elevator Industry Work Preservation Funds, Elevator Constructors Annuity and 401(k) Retirement Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
