Cases filed in the Second Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Singh v. Deloitte LLP
as 23-1108
Plaintiff / Appellant: Rupinder Singh, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Jeffrey S. Popkin, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Joni Walker, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and others
Defendant / Appellee: Deloitte LLP, The Board of Directors of Deloitte LLP, The Retirement Plan Committee of Deloitte LLP and others
Cleary et al v. Kaleida Health et al
as 1:2022cv00025
Plaintiff: Roxanne Cleary, Lisa Wendling, Kimberly Miller and others
Defendant: Kaleida Health, Kaleida Health Retirement Plan Committee, Board of Directors of Kaleida and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Cleary et al v. Kaleida Health et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv00026
Plaintiff: Roxanne Cleary, Lisa Wendling, Kimberly Miller and others
Defendant: Kaleida Health, Kaleida Health Pension Growth Plan, Kaleida Health Retirement Plan Committee and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Singh et al v. Deloitte LLP et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv08458
Plaintiff: Rupinder Singh, Jeffrey S. Popkin, Joni Walker and others
Defendant: Deloitte LLP, The Board of Directors of Deloitte LLP, The Retirement Plan Committee of Deloitte LLP and others
Amicus Curiae: Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.: Civil Enforcement of Employee Benefits
McIntire v. Paychex, Inc. et al
as 6:2020cv06444
Defendant: No. 1-10 Does, The Paychex Inc 401(K) Incentive Retirement Plan Committee and Paychex, Inc.
Plaintiff: Christine A McIntire
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
McIntire v. Paychex, Inc. et al
as 6:2020cv06445
Plaintiff: Christine A McIntire
Defendant: Does No. 1-10, The Paychex, Inc. 401(K) Incentive Retirement Plan Committee and Paychex, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Lutz et al v. Kaleida Health et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2018cv01112
Defendant: Kaleida Health, Susan Vallance and Kaleida Health Retirement Plan Committee
Plaintiff: Kristin Schwartz, Linda Spring, Mary Ellen Lutz and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Sacerdote v. Retirement Plan Committee We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 18-1558
Plaintiff - Appellant: Dr. Alan Sacerdote, individually and as representatives of class of participants and beneficiaries on behalf of the NYU School of Medicine Retirement Plan for Members of the Faculty, Professional Research Staff and Administration and the New York Universi, Dr. Herbert Samuels, individually and as representatives of class of participants and beneficiaries on behalf of the NYU School of Medicine Retirement Plan for Members of the Faculty, Professional Research Staff and Administration and the New York Univers, Marie E. Monaco, individually and as representatives of class of participants and beneficiaries on behalf of the NYU School of Medicine Retirement Plan for Members of the Faculty, Professional Research Staff and Administration and the New York University and others
Defendant - Appellee: Retirement Plan Committee, Michael Burke, Richard Bing and others
Defendant: NYU Langone Hospitals and NYU Langone Health System
Jander v. International Business Machine We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 17-3518
Plaintiff - Appellant: Larry W. Jander, and all other individuals similarly situated and Richard J. Waksman
Defendant - Appellee: International Business Machines Corporation, Retirement Plans Committee of IBM, Richard Carroll and others
Kelly v. Stanadyne Automotive Corp.
as 16-3784
Plaintiff - Appellee: William Kelly
Defendant: Stanadyne Automotive Corp.
Defendant - Appellant: Retirement Plan Committee, AKA SC Pension Plan Committee, AKA Stanadyne Pension Committee, AKA Stanadyne Retirement Benefits Committee

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?