Cases 1 - 4 of 4
Commodity Futures Trading Comm v. Walsh
as 13-105
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Commodity Futures Trading Commission
Appellant:
3M Employee Welfare Benefit Association Trust I, 3M Employee Welfare Benefit Association Trust II, 3M Employee Welfare Benefit Association Trust III and others
Claimant - Appellant:
Blue Cross and Blue Shield Association National Retirement Trust
Defendant:
Stephen Walsh, Paul Greenwood, Westridge Capital Management, Inc. and others
Appellee:
Robb Evans & Associates LLC
Intervenor:
San Diego County Employees Retirement Association, University of Pittsburgh - Of the Commonwealth System of Higher Education, United States of America and others
Securities and Exchange Commis v. WG Trading Investors, L.P.
as 13-106
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Appellant:
3M Employee Welfare Benefit Association Trust I, 3M Employee Welfare Benefit Association Trust II, 3M Employee Welfare Benefit Association Trust III and others
Claimant - Appellant:
Blue Cross and Blue Shield Association National Retirement Trust
Defendant:
WG Trading Investors, L.P., WG Trading Company, Limited Partnership., Westridge Capital Management, Inc. and others
Appellee:
Robb Evans & Associates LLC
Intervenor:
San Diego County Employees Retirement Association, University of Pittsburgh - Of the Commonwealth System of Higher Education, United States of America and others
Acument Global Technologies, Inc. et al v. Towers Watson & Co. et al
as 1:2012cv00506
Plaintiff:
Acument Global Technologies, Inc. and Acument Global Technologies, Inc. Pension Plan
Defendant:
Towers Watson & Co. and Tower Watson Investment Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Mueller v. Towers, Perrin, Forster & Crosby Inc et al
as 3:2010cv01093
Plaintiff:
Susan Mueller
Defendant:
Towers, Perrin, Forster & Crosby Inc and Towers Watson & Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
