Cases 1 - 10 of 31
USA v. Tyron McFadden
as 24-1138
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
TYRON MCFADDEN, a/k/a KEV, a/k/a RON, a/k/a TRO
Christopher Schwenk, et al v. Joseph Garcia, et al
as 23-8017
Petitioner:
CHRISTOPHER LEE SCHWENK and KEITH DRUCK
Respondent:
JOSEPH GARCIA, CORRECTIONS SPECIAL APPLICATION UNIT LLC, YORK COUNTY, Pennsylvania doing business as York County Prison and others
USA v. Charles Salley
as 23-1346
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
CHARLES SALLEY, a/k/a Dark Lo, a/k/a Ron Harvey
USA v. Rodney Boomer
as 23-1128
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
RODNEY BOOMER, a/k/a Ron
In re: Ron Larkin
as 22-1528
Petitioner:
In re: RON LARKIN
Respondent:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA
USA v. Tyron McFadden
as 21-3227
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
TYRON MCFADDEN, also know as KEV, also known as RON, also know as TRO
Alicia Cohen v. Ronald Cohen
as 21-2997
Plaintiff / Appellee:
ALICIA A. COHEN
Defendant / Appellant:
RONALD A. COHEN, a/k/a Rafi Cohen a/ka Rafael Cohen a/k/a Rafa-El Cohen a/k/a Rafael Chaim Ha Cohen a/k/a Rafael Chaim Cohen a/k/a Ron Cohen a/k/a Ronnie Cohen
Artis Carroll, Jr.In re: Artis Carroll, Jr.
as 21-2632
Petitioner:
In re: ARTIS C. CARROLL, JR.
Respondent:
MILLERSVILLE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA, et al., ET AL. LANCASTER COUNTY OF PENNSLYVANIA, ELAINE CHRISSOS and others
Artis Carroll, Jr.In re: Artis Carroll, Jr.
as 21-2625
Petitioner:
In re: ARTIS C. CARROLL, JR.
Respondent:
MILLERSVILLE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA, et al., ET AL. LANCASTER COUNTY OF PENNSLYVANIA, ELAINE CHRISSOS and others
Artis Carroll, Jr.In re: Artis Carroll, Jr.
as 21-2607
Petitioner:
In re: ARTIS C. CARROLL, JR.
Respondent:
MILLERSVILLE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA, et al., ET AL. LANCASTER COUNTY OF PENNSLYVANIA, ELAINE CHRISSOS and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
