Cases 11 - 20 of 2,565
George Druck v. Superintendent Houtzdale SCI
as 24-2045
Plaintiff:
GEORGE DRUCK
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT HOUTZDALE SCI and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Donte Cannon v. Superintendent Rockview SCI, et al
as 24-2074
Plaintiff:
DONTE CANNON
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT ROCKVIEW SCI, DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
John Biddle v. Administrator New Jersey State Prison, et al
as 24-1661
Plaintiff:
JOHN W. BIDDLE
Defendant:
ADMINISTRATOR NEW JERSEY STATE PRISON and ATTORNEY GENERAL NEW JERSEY
Daryl Hayden v. Superintendent Forest SCI, et al
as 24-2075
Plaintiff:
DARYL T. HAYDEN
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT FOREST SCI, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY ALLEGHENY COUNTY
Rodney Derrickson v. Superintendent Forest SCI, et al
as 24-2047
Plaintiff:
RODNEY DERRICKSON
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT FOREST SCI, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY DELAWARE COUNTY
Dwight Hill v. Superintendent Camp Hill SCI, et al
as 24-1636
Plaintiff:
DWIGHT M. HILL
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT CAMP HILL SCI, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY ALLEGHENY COUNTY
Telly Royster v. Superintendent Phoenix SCI, et al
as 24-1698
Plaintiff:
TELLY ROYSTER
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT PHOENIX SCI, DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
John McDonald v. District Attorney Dauphin County, et al
as 24-1650
Plaintiff:
JOHN MAURICE MCDONALD
Defendant:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY DAUPHIN COUNTY, WARDEN FRACKVILLE SCI and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Malik Bey v. Superintendent Laurel Highlands SCI, et al
as 24-1667
Plaintiff:
MALIK ABDUL BEY
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT SOMERSET SCI, PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE and others
Vernon Robinson v. Warden Fort Dix FCI, et al
as 24-1999
Plaintiff:
VERNON ROBINSON
Defendant:
WARDEN FORT DIX FCI, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY LYCOMING COUNTY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
