Cases 41 - 50 of 2,568
Elwood Small v. Superintendent Phoenix SCI, et al
as 24-1592
Plaintiff:
ELWOOD SMALL
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT PHOENIX SCI, DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Ramsey Randall v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole, et al
as 24-1512
Plaintiff:
RAMSEY RANDALL
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE, ELLIOT L. SMEAL, Parole Manager, (PBPP) CHAIR MANWOMAN, (Name Unknown) and others
Michael Romig v. Superintendent Frackville SCI, et al
as 24-1878
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL C. ROMIG
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT FRACKVILLE SCI and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Carl Holdren v. Administrator New Jersey State Prison, et al
as 24-1617
Plaintiff:
CARL J. HOLDREN
Defendant:
ADMINISTRATOR NEW JERSEY STATE PRISON and ATTORNEY GENERAL NEW JERSEY
Kathleen Dorsett v. Warden New Jersey State Prison, et al
as 24-1881
Plaintiff:
KATHLEEN M. DORSETT
Defendant:
ADMINISTRATOR NEW JERSEY STATE PRISON and ATTORNEY GENERAL NEW JERSEY
Christopher Nguyen v. District Attorney Berks County, et al
as 24-1582
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER NGUYEN
Defendant:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY BERKS COUNTY, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and SUPERINTENDENT MAHANOY SCI
Armoni Johnson v. Superintendent Coal Township SCI, et al
as 24-1476
Plaintiff:
ARMONI MASUD JOHNSON
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT COAL TOWNSHIP SCI and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Francis Boyd v. Superintendent Chester SCI, et al
as 24-1692
Petitioner:
FRANCIS BOYD
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT CHESTER SCI, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA
Matthew Milisits v. Superintendent Benner Township SCI, et al
as 24-1839
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW CHRISTIAN MILISITS
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT BENNER TOWNSHIP SCI, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY WESTMORELAND COUNTY
Kaitlyn Cooper Youmans v. Warden SCI Muncy, et al
as 24-1859
Plaintiff:
KAITLYN COOPER YOUMANS
Defendant:
WARDEN SCI MUNCY and OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
