Cases 71 - 80 of 2,570
Dale Arnold v. Superintendent Benner Township SCI, et al
as 24-1423
Plaintiff:
DALE ARNOLD
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT BENNER TOWNSHIP SCI and OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Michael Pavlyik v. Administrator East Jersey State Prison, et al
as 24-1235
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL PAVLYIK
Defendant:
ADMINISTRATOR EAST JERSEY STATE PRISON and ATTORNEY GENERAL NEW JERSEY
Earl Handfield, II v. Superintendent Rockview SCI, et al
as 24-1219
Plaintiff:
EARL C. HANDFIELD, II
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT ROCKVIEW SCI, DISTRICT ATTORNEY CHESTER COUNTY and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Lamar Benton v. Superintendent Dallas SCI, et al
as 24-1187
Plaintiff:
LAMAR BENTON
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT DALLAS SCI, PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Eric Rambert v. Warden Greene SCI, et al
as 24-1313
Plaintiff:
ERIC X. RAMBERT
Defendant:
WARDEN GREENE SCI and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Sidney Clayton v. Superintendent Rockview SCI, et al
as 24-1103
Plaintiff:
SIDNEY W. CLAYTON
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT ROCKVIEW SCI and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Donald Evans v. Superintendent Dallas SCI, et al
as 24-1158
Plaintiff:
DONALD EVANS
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT DALLAS SCI, DISTRICT ATTORNEY DELAWARE COUNTY and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Laroy Hough v. Superintendent Albion SCI, et al
as 24-1180
Plaintiff:
LAROY HOUGH
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT ALBION SCI, DISTRICT ATTORNEY WARREN COUNTY and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Obataiya Scott v. Superintendent Rockview SCI, et al
as 24-1134
Plaintiff:
OBATAIYA SCOTT
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT ROCKVIEW SCI, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY WASHINGTON COUNTY
Rafael Goodman v. Superintendent Waymart SCI, et al
as 24-1178
Plaintiff:
RAFAEL M. GOODMAN
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT WAYMART SCI, DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
