General Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Cases 81 - 90 of 2,570
Isaiha Palmer v. Superintendent James T. Vaughn Correctional Center, et al
as 24-1282
Plaintiff: ISAIHA PALMER
Defendant: SUPERINTENDENT JAMES T. VAUGHN CORRECTIONAL CENTER and ATTORNEY GENERAL DELAWARE
Santos Mota v. Warden Indiana County Jail, et al
as 24-1205
Plaintiff: SANTOS CASTRO MOTA
Defendant: WARDEN INDIANA COUNTY JAIL, DISTRICT ATTORNEY BUCKS COUNTY and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Anatoliy Veretnov v. Superintendent Forest SCI, et al
as 24-1120
Plaintiff: ANATOLIY VERETNOV
Defendant: SUPERINTENDENT FOREST SCI and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
LG Street v. Superintendent Dallas SCI, et al
as 24-1326
Plaintiff: LG STREET
Defendant: SUPERINTENDENT DALLAS SCI and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
James Watson v. Superintendent Albion SCI, et al
as 24-1065
Plaintiff: JAMES WATSON
Defendant: SUPERINTENDENT ALBION SCI and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Paul Parks v. Superintendent Rockview SCI, et al
as 23-3234
Plaintiff: PAUL PARKS
Defendant: SUPERINTENDENT ROCKVIEW SCI, DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Michael Broomer v. Warden James T Vaughn Correctional Center, et al
as 24-1222
Plaintiff: MICHAEL BROOMER
Defendant: WARDEN JAMES T VAUGHN CORRECTIONAL CENTER and ATTORNEY GENERAL DELAWARE
Kareem Stansbury v. Superintendent Camp Hill SCI, et al
as 24-1255
Plaintiff: KAREEM J. STANSBURY
Defendant: SUPERINTENDENT CAMP HILL SCI, DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Kevin Peno v. Superintendent Rockview SCI, et al
as 24-1153
Plaintiff: KEVIN PAUL PENO
Defendant: SUPERINTENDENT ROCKVIEW SCI, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY DAUPHIN COUNTY
Kwame Moore v. Superintendent Greene SCI, et al
as 24-1078
Plaintiff: KWAME MOORE
Defendant: SUPERINTENDENT GREENE SCI, DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?