Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Eric Rhett v. Union County Social Services, et al
as 24-1386
Plaintiff:
ERIC J. RHETT
Defendant:
UNION COUNTY DIVISION OF SOCIAL SERVICES, HI TECH TRAINING SCHOOL, DEBBIE MYERS and others
Winston Banks v. Howard Taylor, et al
as 22-3352
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WINSTON J. BANKS
Defendant / Appellee:
HOWARD A. TAYLOR, Esq., JOSEPH FINEMAN, Esq. (deceased), JEROME TAYLOR, (deceased) and others
Defendant:
AUCLAIR & GILES LAW OFFICE
Patricia Bauer, et al v. Ross Township, et al
as 16-3736
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PATRICIA A. BAUER
Plaintiff - Appellee:
RICHARD E. BAUER
Defendant - Appellee:
TOWNSHIP OF ROSS, HOWARD BEERS, JR., individually and in his official capacity as Ross Township Supervisor, RUSSELL A. KRESGE, JR., individually and in his official capacity as Ross Township Supervisor and others
Frances LaGuardia v. Ross Township, et al
as 16-3735
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FRANCES LAGUARDIA, individually and as Executrix of the Estate of James Vincent LaGuardia, deceased
Defendant - Appellee:
TOWNSHIP OF ROSS, HOWARD BEERS, JR., RUSSELL A. KRESGE, JR. and others
In Re: Asbestos Product
as 15-1988
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LINNIE FRANKENBERGER, Individually and as Special Administrator for the Estate of Howard L. Frankenberger, deceased
Defendant - Appellee:
ANCHOR PACKING CO, AW CHESTERTON, CHEVRON CORP and others
In Re: Asbestos Prod Liab Lit
as 12-2527
Plaintiff - Numerous Parties See Appellant:
ALM MAURITZ, ANVIK NORMAN, BORIAUG WILLARD and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NORTH DAKOTA PIPEFITTER II GROUP PLAINTIFFS
Defendant - Appellee:
A.P.I., INC., A MINNESOTA CORPORATION, ARMSTRONG WORLD IND, A DELAWARE CORPORATION SUCCESSOR ARMSTRONG CORK COMPANY SUCCESSOR KEASBEY & MATTISON COMPANY, ASBESTOS PROD MFG and others
Howard Dobbs v. Kimberly-Clark Corp
as 10-2640
Plaintiff - Appellee:
HOWARD BLAKE DOBBS
Defendant - Appellant:
KIMBERLY CLARK CORP
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
