Torts - Injury Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Cases 1 - 10 of 10
David Martincic, et al v. AO Smith Corp, et al
as 20-3068
Defendant / Appellee: AURORA PUMPS, SAUER INC, SWINDELL-DRESSLER INTERNATIONAL CO and others
Defendant: BMI REFRACTORY SERVICES INC, SULZER PUMPS SOLUTIONS INC, FKA Ahlstrom Pumps LLC, EICHLEAY CORP and others
Defendant / Appellant: FOSTER WHEELER LLC
Plaintiff / Appellee: MERL WILLIAMS, His Husband and DAVID P. MARTINCIC
In Re: Asbestos Product
as 16-3704
Plaintiff - Appellee: LYNN DOBRICK, Personal Representative of the Estate of Valent Rabovski, Deceased and ANN RABOVSKY
Defendant - Appellant: CRANE CO, individually and as successor-in-interest to CHAPMAN VALVE COMPANY
Defendant - Appellee: FOSTER WHEELER ENERGY CORP and PENNSYLVANIA ELECTRIC CO
Linda Hammell v. Air and Liquid Systems Corp, et al
as 15-2643
Plaintiff - Appellant: LINDA HAMMELL, individually and as Executrix and Executrix ad Prosequendum of the Estate of Arthur Hammell
Defendant - Appellee: AIR AND LIQUID SYSTEMS CORP, as successor by merger to Buffalo Pump, Inc., ARVINMERITOR INC, FKA Arvin Industries Inc, individually and as successor by merger to Rockwell International, BORG WARNER MORSE TEC, FKA Borg Warner Inc and others
Linda Hammell v. Air and Liquid Systems Corp, et al
as 15-2643
Plaintiff / Appellant: LINDA HAMMELL, individually and as Executrix and Executrix ad Prosequendum of the Estate of Arthur Hammell
Defendant: CARRIER CORP, TODD SHIPYARDS, individually and for its Todd Combustion Division formerly known as American Standard, Inc., successor-ininterest to Kewanee Boiler Corp., EATON CORP, as successor-in-interest to Cutler-Hammer, Inc. agent ofn/k/a Eaton Electrical, Inc. and others
Defendant / Appellee: CBS CORP, a Delaware Corporation, f/k/a Viacom, Inc., individually and as successor by merger to CBS Corporation, a Pennsylvania Corporation, f/k/a Westinghouse Electric Corporation, CRANE CO, successor to Jenkins Valves, Inc. also known as Jenkins Bros., FOSTER WHEELER CORP and others
In Re: Asbestos Products, et al
as 13-2325
Plaintiff / Appellant: LAWRENCE PAYNE
Defendant / Appellee: A W CHESTERTON CO, AIR AND LIQUID SYSTEMS INC, AKA Buffalo Pumps Inc, ALDRICH COMPANY and others
Debtor / Appellee: ITT CORP, SPRINKMANN SONS CORP, UNION CARBIDE CORP and others
In Re: Asbestos Products, et al
as 13-2325
Plaintiff - Appellant: LAWRENCE PAYNE
Defendant - Appellee: A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY, AIR AND LIQUID SYSTEMS INC, AKA Buffalo Pumps Inc, ALDRICH COMPANY and others
Debtor - Appellee: ITT CORP, SPRINKMANN SONS CORP, UNION CARBIDE CORP and others
In Re: Asbestos Products, et al
as 13-2181
Plaintiff / Appellant: LAWRENCE PAYNE
Defendant / Appellee: A W CHESTERTON CO, AIR AND LIQUID SYSTEMS INC, AKA Buffalo Pumps Inc, ALDRICH COMPANY and others
Debtor / Appellee: EATON CORP, ITT CORP, SPRINKMANN SONS CORP and others
In Re: Asbestos Products, et al
as 13-2181
Plaintiff - Appellant: LAWRENCE PAYNE
Defendant - Appellee: A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY, AIR AND LIQUID SYSTEMS INC, AKA Buffalo Pumps Inc, ALDRICH COMPANY and others
Debtor - Appellee: EATON CORP, ITT CORP, SPRINKMANN SONS CORP and others
In Re: Asbestos Prod
as 10-4578
Plaintiff - Appellant: RUTH FADDISH, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE AND SURVIVORS OF JOHN FADDIS DECEASED
Defendant - Appellee: BUFFALO PUMPS INC, VIAD CORP, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS SUCCESSOR TO GRISCOM RUSSELL COMPANY FORMERLY KNOWN AS THE DIAL CORPORATION, GENERAL ELECTRIC CO and others
Barbara Anderson v. Bondex Intl Inc, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 10-2306
Plaintiff - Appellant: BARBARA ANNE ANDERSON
Defendant - Appellee: BONDEX INTL INC, CBS CORP, A Delaware Corporation (Successor By Merger With CBS Corporation F/K/A Westinghouse Electric Corporation)Formerly Known As Viacom Inc., GEORGIA PACIFIC CORP, A Georgia Corporation (Sued Individually And As Successor-In_Interest To Bestwall Gypsum Company) and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?