Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Cases 11 - 20 of 39
K. R.G., et al v. Secretary of Health and Human, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 15-1400
Plaintiff - Appellant: K. E. R.G., United States Ex Rel. The Minor Child, LAWRENCE COX, NANCY RODRIGUEZ COX, Conservator of the Minor Child and others
Defendant - Appellee: SECRETARY UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, ESKINDER NEGASH, Director of the Office of Refugee Resettlement (ORR), TRICIA SWARTZ, Associate Deputy Director of Children's Services of the Office of Refugee Resettlement (ORR) and others
Ivan Mendez v. President United States of Ame, et al
as 14-1911
Plaintiff - Appellant: IVAN L. MENDEZ
Defendant: PRESIDENT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, VICE PRESIDENT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ENRIQUE PENA NIETO, President of Mexico and others
Jose Rosario Colon v. Secretary United States Depart
as 13-4783
Plaintiff - Appellant: JOSE LUIS ROSARIO COLON, also known as Leavitt Rodriguez
Defendant - Appellee: SECRETARY UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Oscar Abelenda v. Warden Fort Dix FCI
as 13-4239
Plaintiff - Appellant: OSCAR ABELENDA
Defendant - Appellee: WARDEN FORT DIX FCI, SECRETARY UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, DIRECTOR IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT AGENCY and others
Pedro Tavares v. Attorney General United States, et al
as 12-4543
Plaintiff - Appellant: PEDRO JUAN TAVARES
Defendant - Appellee: ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, SECRETARY UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, BRIAN ELWOOD, Monmouth County Jail Warden and others
Mikhail Bulatov v. Roy Hendricks, et al
as 12-4409
Plaintiff - Appellant: MIKHAIL BULATOV
Defendant - Appellee: ROY L. HENDRICKS, in his official capacity as Warden, Essex County Correctional Facility, Newark, New Jersey, JOHN TSOUKARIS, in his official capacity as Newark Field Office Director for Detention and Removal, JOHN MORTON, in his official capacity as Acting Assistant Secretary of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement and others
Franklyn Gonzalez-Ramirez v. Secretary US Dept Homeland Sec, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 12-3813
Plaintiff - Appellee: FRANKLYN RAFAEL GONZALEZ-RAMIREZ
Defendant - Appellee: SECRETARY UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, DIRECTOR US ICE, GARY MEAD, as Executive Associate Director for Enforcement and Removal Operations, ICE and others
Defendant - Appellant: ORLANDO RODRIGUEZ, as Warden of the Elizabeth Detention Center, Corrections Corporation of America under contract with ICE
Pedro Mira Munoz v. Mark Lospinuso, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 12-3578
Plaintiff - Appellee: PEDRO JOSUE MIRA MUNOZ
Defendant - Appellant: MARK LOSPINUSO, Acting Warden of Keogh Dwyer Correctional Facility, WAYNE MULLER, Office of Detention and Removal for U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, WILLIAM JOYCE, Assistant Field Office Director, Office of Detention and Removal for U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement and others
Fattah v. Mitra, et al
as 12-2460
Plaintiff - Appellant: ABDEL FATTAH
Defendant - Appellee: KELLY A. MITRA, Supervisory Detention and Deportation Office for the US Department of Homeland Security and U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), MARY SABOL, Warden York County Prison, THOMAS DECKER, Field Office Director, Department of Homeland Security (DHS), Philadelphia Field Office and others
Shechem Lafayette v. Roy Hendrix, et al
as 12-1986
Plaintiff - Appellant: SHECHEM S. LAFAYETTE
Defendant - Appellee: ROY HENDRIX, in his Official Capacity as Warden for the Essex County Correctional Facility in Newark, New Jersey, JOHN TSOUKARIS, in his Official Capacity as Newark Acting Field Office Director and Removal, JOHN MORTON, in his Official Capacity as Acting Assistant Secretary of the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?