Cases 11 - 20 of 41
James Dorsey v. Superintendent Fayette SCI, et al
as 17-1197
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES EARL DORSEY
Defendant - Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT FAYETTE SCI and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Earl Mosley, Jr. v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, et al
as 16-4309
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EARL K. MOSLEY, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY ALLEGHENY COUNTY
James Johnson v. Superintendent Mahanoy SCI, et al
as 16-3289
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES EARL JOHNSON
Defendant - Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT MAHANOY SCI, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY ERIE COUNTY
William Trice v. Harrington Police Department, et al
as 15-3053
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM R. TRICE
Defendant - Appellee:
HARRINGTON POLICE DEPARTMENT, LT. ERIC MALONEY, OFFICER KEITH B. SHYERS and others
USA v. Daniel Eyster
as 14-4641
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
DANIEL EARL EYSTER, a/k/a Daniel Eyster
Earl Box v. Superintendent Pittsburgh SCI, et al
as 14-3824
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EARL G. BOX
Defendant - Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT PITTSBURGH SCI, DISTRICT ATTORNEY DAUPHIN COUNTY and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
USA v. Earl Moore
as 13-3439
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
EARL MOORE, a/k/a JEROME MIXON, a/k/a, a/k/a, REDBONE
Jerry Chambers, Sr. v. Renee Hughes, et al
as 13-2293
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JERRY A. CHAMBERS, SR.
Defendant - Appellee:
RENEE C. HUGHES, CHARLES P. MIRARCHI, III, Esq., NORMAN SCOTT and others
Earl Smith v. Paul Lagana, et al
as 13-2149
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EARL SMITH
Defendant - Appellee:
PAUL LAGANA, T. DIGGS and LT. FOLEY
Defendant:
D. GRUNDY, F. CROWELL, R. LARACUENTE and others
Timothy Hale, et al v. Harry Wilson, et al
as 13-1478
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TIMOTHY A. HALE
Plaintiff - Appellee:
DOMINGO COLON MONTANEZ
Defendant - Appellee:
HARRY E. WILSON, DIAN DETWILER, MICHAEL OPPMAN and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
